When it comes to paying for care home fees, many individuals and families seek ways to protect their assets. One common method is through the deprivation of assets. However, local authorities are well aware of this tactic and have stringent measures in place to check for any deliberate attempts to avoid care home fees. This blog post will delve into how local authorities check deprivation of assets, especially in the context of Lymm care homes.
Understanding Deprivation of Assets to avoid care Home Fees
Deprivation of assets occurs when an individual deliberately reduces their wealth to avoid paying for care home fees. This can include transferring property, gifting money, or spending large sums on non-essential items. While it may seem like a viable option for care fees planning, it's important to understand that local authorities have robust systems in place to detect such actions.
Legal Framework
Local authorities operate within a legal framework set out by the Care Act 2014 and its accompanying regulations and guidance. The Act provides clear guidelines on what constitutes deprivation of assets and the steps that should be taken if it is suspected. Under these regulations, if an individual is found to have deliberately deprived themselves of assets with the intention of avoiding care home fees, the local authority has the right to treat them as if they still own those assets.
Financial Assessments
One of the primary methods used by local authorities to check for deprivation of assets is through financial assessments. When an individual applies for financial support for care home fees, they must undergo a means test. This test examines their income, savings, and other assets.
Detailed Scrutiny
During this assessment, local authorities will scrutinise financial records meticulously. They will look at bank statements, property ownership records, and any significant transactions made over a certain period—often up to seven years prior to the application.
Red Flags
Certain actions can raise red flags during these assessments:
Large cash withdrawals
Transfer or sale of property below market value
Significant gifts or loans
Unusual spending patterns
If any such activities are detected, further investigation will be conducted.
Investigative Measures
Local authorities employ various investigative measures to ensure that all information provided during financial assessments is accurate and truthful.
Interviews
Interviews with applicants and their family members are common practice. These interviews aim to gather more information about any significant transactions or changes in asset ownership.
Cross-referencing Data
Local authorities often cross-reference data with other government departments such as HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and Land Registry. This helps them verify property ownership details and track any discrepancies in reported income or asset transfers.
Professional Advice
In some cases, local authorities may seek professional advice from financial experts or solicitors specialising in elder law. These professionals can provide insights into complex financial arrangements that may not be immediately apparent during initial assessments.
Consequences of Deprivation of Assets
If a local authority concludes that an individual has deliberately deprived themselves of assets with the intention of avoiding care home fees, there are several consequences:
Financial Penalties
The individual may be treated as still owning those assets when calculating their contribution towards care costs. This means they could end up paying more than anticipated out-of-pocket expenses for their care needs.
Legal Action
In extreme cases where fraudulent activity is suspected or proven beyond doubt; legal action could be taken against those involved in orchestrating such schemes—resulting potentially severe penalties including fines or imprisonment depending upon severity & nature offences committed under applicable laws governing fraud/theft etcetera within jurisdiction concerned (e.g., UK).
Ethical Considerations
While it might seem tempting at first glance attempt circumventing rules governing payment residential/nursing homes via strategies like asset-deprivation; ethical considerations must also factored into equation before making decisions affecting long-term welfare loved ones requiring specialised medical attention/support services provided within these facilities:
Quality Care: Ensuring highest possible standards maintained throughout duration stay remains paramount importance regardless cost implications involved.
Fairness: Contributing fairly towards communal resources ensures sustainability system designed help most vulnerable society receive necessary assistance without undue burden placed upon taxpayers/public funds.
Peace Mind: Knowing arrangements made transparently ethically allows families focus emotional well-being rather than worrying potential repercussions arising from questionable practices employed circumvent legitimate obligations owed community-at-large ensuring equitable distribution available resources amongst deserving beneficiaries thereof accordingly.
Comments